2014 translvania epic, stage two
On the menu today: forty-one miles of mountain bike
racing. Not all single track miles, but
probably half. At least half. Lots of tight, twisty single track. Lots of East Coast Rocks.
If you want to take a drive to do some mountain biking, let me recommend this. Park somewhere near the checkpoint and go ride some of these trails. Lovely stuff. |
Forty-one miles, 5,200' of climbing. |
Neutral rollout for the first 1.5 miles. I’m tempted to say that was my favorite
part. Nine miles of dirt-road racing
followed. I can do that. Sometimes, I can do that well, though I would
have preferred a different bike.
Then we hit the single track. Climbing.
Mostly. At first, anyway. And that was a lot of fun. A couple of weeks ago I came up to pre-ride
this very stage. There were two different
trails in the tentative course at that time (I had a GPS track to follow, but
the course changed since then) that were much, much harder than this section
that replaced them. I’m very glad of
that.
Anyway, this first trail was loads of fun. I had to remind myself that I was, indeed,
having fun, and that I enjoy riding this stuff.
That if I were up here with my buddies on a casual ride this would be
too lovely. We would stop and take
pictures and talk about how awesome it is to ride bikes, to be fit, to be able
to do this sort of thing, to have made the choice
to be doing this sort of thing. I have
to remind myself of that because, when it’s race day, when there’s a number
pinned on and somebody is keeping score…when that…well, when I’m racing I
hate being left behind by dudes that I can otherwise ride with. I hate being left behind period, but
especially by dudes that I can otherwise ride with. Through those nine miles of dirt road there
was a kind of selection. Really, it was
probably half the field still, maybe a little less, but a lot of riders. The pace had been brisk, but not insane. But then we get into this single track and I
get gapped. Not immediately. I can keep the pace for a while. But slowly—a bit through this rock garden, a
bit more down a steep descent—I get gapped, and the folks behind want to come
around, and so they do, and I get a bit flustered and sort of pissed off and I
have to remind myself that this is indeed fun.
Actually, it’s not that fun.
It’s a bike race, and I hate losing bike races. Which, of course, is weird, because I’ve
spent a tidy fortune over the years losing bike races. So maybe it’s better to say that I so like winning bike races. There are, of course, worse ways to spend
one’s time and money. (I hesitate to use
the word “worse.” I mean, who’s to
say?) All the same, I think every
amateur athlete, every pay-to-play bike racer, has to ask, occasionally, if not
constantly: Why do I do this?
Let’s rejoin Abbey on his adventure:
“Fresh slides appear on the mud banks; a beaver plops into
the water ahead of us, disappears. The
beavers are making a comeback on the Green.
Time for D. Julien, Jim Bridger, Joe Meek, Jed Smith, and Jim Beckwourth
to reappear. Eternal recurrence, announced
Nietzsche. Time for the mountain men to
return. The American West has not given
us, so far, sufficient men to match our mountains. Or not since the death of Crazy Horse,
Sitting Bull, Dull Knife, Red Cloud, Chief Joseph, Little Wolf, Red Shirt, Gall,
Geronimo, Cochise, Tenaya (to name but a few), and their comrades. With their defeat died a bold, brave, heroic
way of life, one as fine as anything recorded history has to show us. Speaking for myself, I’d sooner have been a
liver-eating, savage horseman, riding with Red Cloud, than a slave-owning
sophist sipping tempered wine in Periclean Athens. For example.
Even Attila the Hun, known locally as the Scourge of God, brought more
fresh air and freedom into Europe than the crowd who gave us the syllogism and
geometry, Aristotle and his Categories,
Plato and his Laws.”
He mentions Nietzsche.
I think Nietzsche would have liked that paragraph. As would Ayn Rand, which concerns me a great
deal.
What I find fascinating about this passage is Abbey’s apparent
embrace of exceptionalism. Human
exceptionalism. Not human as in humans
animals being exceptional compared to bugs and trees and animals and rocks
(elsewhere, Abbey tells us even the rocks have feelings). But exceptionalism a la Nietzsche’s uberman
and Rand’s Howard Roark. Exceptionalism a la “The Incredibles.” (Remember it was the bad guy in “The
Incredibles” that wanted everyone to be super, so that no one would be; the
villain believed in the ultimate democratization of humanity via technology. Transhumanists, what do you think of
that? Is the bad in “The Incredibles” any different than the good in transhumanism? I ask the transhumanists, because they are
very concerned with the matter of human exceptionalism.)
The thing is, I totally get where Abbey’s coming from
here. I would worship at the alter of
the uberman (as does every
Christian). There’s something engrained
in my psyche, be it by nurture or nature, that adores and revers the
exceptional. The exceptional scholar, the exceptional writer, the exceptional
orator, the exceptional craftsman (or woman), the exceptional artist, the
exceptional cook, the exceptional friend…the exceptional athlete. I’m repelled by Rand’s objectivism, yet
seduced by her uberman, Howard
Roark. Democratize the human race? Hell no!
Let there be supers!
But oh what examples of the uberman Abbey provides! Brutal,
violent men. Great because of their brutality.
Respected through fear. These are
not case studies that we use to teach leadership in school. We don’t tell adoring bedtime stories to our
children about these guys. (Confession: I’m thinking more of Attila than Little
Wolf here, given that I have no idea who Little Wolf is, and next to nothing of
the leadership styles of those with whom Abbey grouped him. But the point about bedtime stories is
accurate nonetheless.)
So why do I race bikes?
I don’t know, but I’ll tell you this: I love to win. I love to be the strongest dude in a
group. I love to be the first over the
line. I love to feel…superior. Dr. Seuss told us that when we grow up we
would play “games you can’t win / ‘cause you’ll play against you.” I don’t like those games. (Although I may be playing one now.) I like game with winners.
So why do I race bikes?
Abbey seems to prefer Thoreau to Emerson. The former he judges genuine, the later
privileged and sheltered. But I think
I’m an Emerson man, because, among other things, Emerson taught me to trust
what I think, feel, and desire as legitimate.
As godly. As qualities of the uberman.
“There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at
the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must
take himself for better, for worse, as his portion… The power which resides in him is new in
nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know
until he has tried.
“Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string”
(From “Self-Reliance.)
It’s in me. What more
is there to say? Only in sex do I feel
more human, more alive, more in tune with what millions of years of evolution
has prepared…or, if you rather, fulfilling the measure of my creation.
And yet today I suffered.
Greatly.
I came upon the first checkpoint, mile 18, 1:30 in, having
only drank one water bottle and, inexplicably, only taking one more. Five hundred feet from the checkpoint I
realized I’d made a big mistake, but the racing impetus kept me from doing what
would have been wise—repenting; turning around and loading up. Eleven long, hard, mostly East-Coast-Rocks
miles and I was back to the checkpoint (first and second checkpoints were the
same checkpoint, just at different points on the course). But I had been out of anything to drink for
close to 45 minutes. And I was
dragging. Clawing up the climbs at a
miserable pace. Frustrated at the time I
was sure I was losing at this point, and all the more so knowing that my poor
hydration decisions were having a deleterious impact on my finishing time. At the second checkpoint I drank 30 ounces in
one gulp. I was in a bad place.
I hate race reports full of woe-is-me, but this race was
remarkable—to me—in how early and often and comprehensive (every muscle group
in my legs, as well as my feet and hands) was my cramping. And in this case that’s doubly unfortunate,
because by the time we hit the final climb I was feeling about 100 times better
than an hour earlier, but I couldn’t stand without cramping, and I’m at my best
climbing when I’m out of the saddle.
Finishing time, right at 5:00 hours. Which was good enough for 6th in
the 40+ on the day. The overall winner,
Jeremiah Bishop, dispatched the course in under 3:40. The 40+ top 3 were 20-30 minutes faster than
me.
2 comments:
Great posts so far, Nate! Enjoying the read.
You're a damn Randian objectivist.... at least you're authentic in your desire to subdue others.
If I were better at my various pursuits, I wonder if winning would become more important. I think a long time ago I decided that winning (in games, in school, in the economy) wasn't important as a way to feel better about not winning. Neitszche would hate me. But I would gladly fist fight him over it.
Post a Comment